Retirement In Sight: What Matters More in Retirement: Income or Savings?

What Matters More in Retirement: Income or Savings?

Retirement saving is not just about accumulating assets. It is also about laying the groundwork for retirement spending. Any retirement strategy has a core goal: the goal of helping an individual or couple pursue their retirement dreams once their careers have concluded.

So, from that perspective, the amount that needs to be saved directly relates to the amount a retiree household may need to spend. To live your best retirement, your degree of retirement savings needs to be great enough to try to correspond to that vision.

Often, articles state that pre-retirees will need to live on 70% to 80% of their final working incomes. This is a general guideline, yet it may not prove true for a particular household. Some people retire and find they are spending less than they once did. Others spend as much as they did while working, maybe even a bit more, due to traveling, hobbies, and social engagements.

What does this imply for retirement saving? While you arguably cannot save too much for the future, you can save too little.[1]

Are Baby Boomers Flocking to Big Cities?

A quick look at some federal government statistics provides a quick answer: no. Perhaps it seems like big cities are filled with baby boomers because of the simple fact that this demographic group is larger than others. Research does not back up this assumption, however.

As a recent New York Times analysis of Census Bureau data noted, 17.2% of Americans age 54-72 lived in urban areas in 2018; back in 1990, 21.6% did. This percentage declined gradually, but steadily, over these 28 years, and looking more closely at the decline, the 54- to 72-year-olds of 2018 were 11% less likely to live in urban neighborhoods than the 54- to 72-year-olds of 2000.

As other Census Bureau data from 1990-2018 reveal, the Americans most likely to live in urban settings have been those age 25 to 29. The least likely? Those aged 70 to 74. The odds of urban living start to increase again after age 80. Even so, just two years ago, only 19.8% of Americans age 85 or older lived in urban settings.[2]

On the Bright Side

A fair number of employers are offering phased retirements. According to the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, 30% of U.S. companies permit their workers to move from full-time hours to part-time hours as part of a retirement transition, and 21% allow employees to move into less-stressful roles prior to retiring.[3]

Advisory services are offered through Lighthouse Financial, LLC, a SEC Registered Investment Advisor. Lighthouse Financial, LLC does not provide legal or tax advice. The information contained herein is obtained from sources deemed to be reliable. Lighthouse Financial, LLC cannot be responsible for the accuracy of the information being presented.

This material was prepared by MarketingPro, Inc., and does not necessarily represent the views of the presenting party, nor their affiliates. This information has been derived from sources believed to be accurate. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. This information should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice and may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any Federal tax penalty.

Citations
1 – forbes.com/sites/kristinmckenna/2019/07/10/debunked-6-myths-about-retirement [7/10/19]
2 – nytimes.com/2020/01/24/upshot/myth-urban-boomer.html [1/24/20]
3 – cnbc.com/2019/10/04/earning-income-after-65-how-to-make-it-work-for-you.html [10/4/19]

Tags:

Comments are closed.