Retirement In Sight: Is Social Security Coming Up Short for Retirees?

The nonpartisan Senior Citizens League (SCL) says yes, charging that the wrong metric is being used to determine cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) to retiree benefits. The federal government uses the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) to figure various COLAs. Younger, employed people usually have lower medical expenses than older people; they also spend more money on gasoline and transportation than retirees do. Senior advocates argue that the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly (CPI-E) should be used instead of the CPI-W, especially since medical costs have risen quickly in recent years while gasoline prices and transportation costs have fallen.

An SCL analysis estimates that if the CPI-E was the COLA yardstick, Social Security recipients would have had COLAs of 0.6% and 1.5% in 2016 and 2017 rather than 0% and 0.3%. Since 2014, the SCL has surveyed retirees annually; in each survey, about 90% of respondents said that their monthly household budgets grew by at least $39 year over year. In SCL’s 2017 survey, 37% of those polled said that their monthly expenses were more than $119 above where they had been a year ago. What expenses had jumped the most from last year? Medical costs and food.[1]

Are Self-Driving Cars Really on the Way?

Americans love to drive, and they associate cars with personal freedom. So, perhaps, this finding will not surprise you: 40% of baby boomers responding to the J.D. Power U.S. Tech Choice Study said that they saw no benefit to having self-driving cars and trucks on the nation’s roads. That was an increase from the 2016 study.

The percentage of 70-somethings who said that they were wary of self-driving cars increased by 9% last year. In addition, 11% more millennials distrusted the technology in 2017 compared with 2016. The only demographic that maintained its level of optimism about autonomous vehicles was Generation Y (people roughly 25–40 years old). While auto industry futurists are audaciously claiming that our entire relationship with cars is about to change, that revolution may be far off. In January, the American Automobile Association polled more than 8,500 drivers who had bought or leased new vehicles since 2012. Three-quarters of them said that they would be afraid to ride in a self-driving car.[2]

On the Bright Side

The 2017 Fidelity Investments Social Security IQ Survey finds that most pre-retirees age 55–61 plan to wait until age 67 to claim Social Security, which would give them a larger monthly benefit than if they were to claim at age 62.[3]

Registered Representative, Securities offered through Cambridge Investment Research, Inc., a Broker/Dealer, Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment Advisor Representative, Lighthouse Financial, LLC., a Registered Investment Advisor.Cambridge and Lighthouse Financial, LLC., are not affiliated.

This material was prepared by MarketingPro, Inc., and does not necessarily represent the views of the presenting party, nor their affiliates. This information has been derived from sources believed to be accurate. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. This information should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice and may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any Federal tax penalty.

Citations
1 – foxbusiness.com/features/2017/05/07/social-security-not-keeping-up-with-seniors-rising-costs.html [5/7/17]
2 – tinyurl.com/lhl3dkw [4/19/17]
3 – fidelity.com/about-fidelity/individual-investing/2017-social-security-survey [4/28/17]

Comments are closed.